Apple vs. EU DMA: Court challenge, feature delays claim, and the EU’s pushback

Apple has taken its criticism of the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA) to the General Court in Luxembourg, calling the regulation “hugely onerous and intrusive.” The hearing coincides with the European Commission’s first formal review of the law. Apple argues the DMA harms consumer privacy and product quality and has even claimed it delayed features like AirPods Live Translation, iPhone Mirroring in macOS, and Visited Places / Preferred Routes in Maps.

What Apple is challenging

• Interoperability with rival hardware: Apple says forcing iPhone compatibility with third-party earbuds and wearables is a security risk.
• App Store obligations: The company objects to the App Store’s inclusion under DMA gatekeeper rules (e.g., alternative app stores and anti-steering requirements).
• iMessage probe: Apple is also disputing scrutiny over whether iMessage should fall under the DMA’s interoperability provisions.

The EU’s response

European Commission counsel pushed back, highlighting Apple’s “absolute control” over the iPhone ecosystem and the “supernormal profits” that result when rivals can’t compete on equal footing. An EU spokesperson previously said the Commission has “absolutely no intention” of repealing the DMA, which aims to open digital markets and curb gatekeeper power.

Why this matters

• For users: The DMA targets more choice (alternative app stores, payment options) and better interoperability. Apple argues those changes could increase risk and degrade experience.
• For developers: Potentially lower distribution barriers and fees, but with new compliance complexity and store fragmentation.
• For the industry: The case will help define how far the EU can push large platforms to open up core services and hardware.

Context: What the DMA does

• Designates large platforms as gatekeepers with duties around interoperability, anti-steering, data access, and side-loading/alternative app stores (where applicable).
• Enforcement includes fines and structural remedies for non-compliance.

What to watch: Whether the court narrows any obligations, how Apple implements mandated changes pending appeals, and if the EC adds further services (e.g., messaging) under DMA scope in future reviews.

References:
Coverage summary and quotes ·
European Commission: Digital Markets Act

Discussion: Do you view the DMA as a necessary check on platform power—or does Apple have a point about security and user experience trade‑offs?