Bloom 1.5 for macOS: Faster Finder Alternative + Limited-Time $12 Deal

Bloom, a productivity-focused Finder alternative for macOS, has been updated to version 1.5.0. The release brings general performance improvements and bug fixes aimed at speeding up everyday file operations. To mark the update, the developer is running a limited-time promo: use code PRODUCTHUNT to get Bloom for $12 (regular $16) through the end of the month.

What Bloom is and why it stands out

Bloom positions itself as a faster, more configurable file manager for power users who want to move beyond Finder’s defaults. It focuses on speed, keyboard-driven navigation and a streamlined interface for quick file actions.

• Productivity-centric UI: Designed to reduce clicks and accelerate common file tasks.
• Advanced navigation & search: Quickly jump between locations and filter files without breaking flow.
• Batch operations: Handle multiple files at once (e.g., renaming) to save time.
• Preview & archives: Peek at files and inspect archives without full extraction.
• Customizable layout: Arrange panes/columns to fit your workflow priorities.

What’s new in 1.5.0

The 1.5.0 release focuses on performance and stability improvements, plus a series of fixes to smooth rough edges discovered by users. If you tried Bloom earlier, this update should feel snappier and more reliable across common tasks.

Pricing and the promo

• Limited-time price: $12 with code PRODUCTHUNT (ends this month)
• Regular price: $16
• Official site: bloomapp.club

Note: Pricing and promotions may vary by region; confirm the discount at checkout on the official site.

Who should try Bloom?

• Power users who prefer keyboard-centric workflows and faster navigation than stock Finder.
• Creators and developers who juggle lots of files and benefit from batch operations and flexible views.
• Anyone looking for a more streamlined, distraction-free file manager on macOS.

More info:
Official Bloom website

Discussion: What’s the #1 Finder pain point you’d want a replacement like Bloom to fix—speed, batch renaming, search, or layout flexibility?